Knowledge

UHF vs. Ultrasonic (AE) — Which is better for GIS testing?

Jul 03, 2026 Leave a message

Q: Some engineers use acoustic devices, others use UHF monitors. Which is superior?

A: They are partners, not competitors. UHF is for scanning electromagnetic waves; AE is for pinpointing mechanical vibrations.

Comparison Matrix:

Method

Signal Type

Best For

Sensitivity

UHF 

Electromagnetic

Insulator voids / Overall scan

Extremely High

AE 

Mechanical Wave

Moving metallic particles / Pinpointing

High (Close range)

 

FAQ 1: Sensor Placement - Where to "Stick" them?

 

Q: GIS is a long pipe. Can I place sensors anywhere?

A: No. The tank acts as a Faraday Cage. You must look for the "Leakage Points."

Optimal Locations:

 UHF Sensors: Place over Basin Insulators. Waves "leak" through the resin seals.

•AE Sensors: Place on the tank wall near joints, bottom of busbars, or CB tanks.

Pro Tip: Use ultrasonic couplant (grease) for AE sensors to ensure a perfect mechanical link.

 

FAQ 2: PRPD Patterns - Identifying the "Tumor"

Q: How do I know if it is dust or a failing insulator from the dot cloud?

A: We use Phase Resolved PD (PRPD) patterns to fingerprint the defect.

Pattern Shape

Diagnosis

Threat Level

Random Spots

Moving Metallic Particles

❌ Critical (Jumping danger)

Symmetrical Clouds

Internal Voids (Bubbles)

⚠️ Warning (Electrical treeing)

Stable Brush

Fixed Protrusion (Burrs)

❌ Critical (Stress concentration)

Send Inquiry